CT 169 Strong will hold a rally at Old Greenwich Station in Old Greenwich on Friday April 8 from 4:00 p.m. at 5 p.m. The address is 1 Sound Beach Avenue. The group will rally against several zoning bills pending in the General Assembly that would remove local authority from our local planning and zoning commissions.
Several elected officials will be in attendance, including State Senator Ryan Fazio (R-36), State Senator Tony Hwang (R-28) representing Easton, Fairfield, Newtown, Weston and State Representative Kimberly Fiorello (R- 149) representing parts of Greenwich and North Stamford, will speak.
Among the bills:
TOD (HB 5429) is a bill that would allow dense, “as-of-right” development within half a mile of train and transit hubs, and it does not take into account historic areas or the preservation of open space. The TOD bill did not come out of committee, but it may be inserted into a mock bill or may be attached to an omnibus bill during the session.
Equitable Sharing (HB 5204): If passed, this bill would create a formula (which has yet to be determined) that would mandate the expansion of affordable housing in cities deemed insufficient, and could augment the current Affordable Housing Act (8 -30g) the objective of 10% of the total building stock must reach 20%. This may require large increases in density to meet the new yet undetermined target.
According to a flyer for the event, state lawmakers have proposed one-size-fits-all zoning mandates aimed at flooding downtown areas and 1/2 mile from transit stations with high-density residential apartments “as of right. » at the market rate for developments. They say the state mandates seek to override local zoning rules, remove public hearings and cities’ ability to control permanent land use decisions.
According to CT 169 Strong missionthere are three groups who benefit from zoning that trumps local zoning control: “opportunistic politicians…who distract from their inability to be effective in their own capacities, political activists with simplistic mistaken” and “misleading statistics” who “build to increase their resumes at the expense of our future in our towns and cities”, and the predatory builders “who would obtain massive and full access to the construction of our towns and cities … »